Is most of SEO just a boondoggle?

Compare the value of boondoggle SEO techniques with simply making smart Title tag changes. Now there’s something that can indeed lead to long-term measurable results in the search engines. Other techniques that make a difference when done correctly are the flattening of the site architecture (for real, not through nofollow attributes), the descriptive naming of internal anchor text, as well as the rewriting of content to better speak to the target audience. And of course, having a link-worthy site and getting the word out about it to the proper channels will always be worthwhile.

Jill Whalen, Is Most Of SEO Just A Boondoggle? (Emphasis mine.)

I've been saying exactly that for years internally at BigCo or to my clients. What makes your site bubble up in search engine result pages is, first and foremost, your content and how well you write it for the web. And paying third parties like SEO to write your content is, in most cases, a dumb idea.

The main problem is that this kind of advice usually falls on deaf ears: of precisely those who are responsible for the hardest part of creating and maintaining a web site, producing content. When those are too lazy or simply incompetent in that matter, their very first tactic to improve traffic is to turn to... SEOs. And especially the worse ones, those who don't ask their clients to do any work.

A good SEO will involve the business people with a lot of questions and suggestions pertaining to the site content and architecture. A very good SEO will educate you on how you can naturally do natural SEO yourself. (Seems pretty obvious, isn't it?)
A bad SEO will talk to business people just to make lots of promises and will get back with purely technical recommendations for the webmaster, full of markup changes such as rel="nofollow" and sitemaps, none of which demanding any significant change to actual content or structure.

Oh, and a sure sign of a craptacularly bad SEO is one who suggests using META keywords. They are still people out there who think it actually works or who make people think so. Amazing but true.

2 Comments

Thanks for the mention, François. Glad you agree!

SEo must be charged and it is for free. This is not an easy task just like your just sitting down and watch tv. It takes effort to make such a website on the top. It is a profession and making this kind of work is not spamming. Unless they're just making it for their on sake. A development company that offers website content writing services is a great help when making a website. With the help of SEO specialist, making a website is more profecient.

[Author's note: "making this kind of work is not spamming. Unless they're just making it for their on sake." Then, spare the irony, you won't mind if I remove your spammy link from your spammy comment.]

mensuelles Archives

Recent Entries

  • Steve Jobs

    "Remembering that I’ll be dead soon is the most important tool I’ve ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because...

  • Your privacy on MOTOBLUR by Motorola

    After the Nokia Ovi Store carelessness, it's now Motorola who's allowing strangers to get access to your private information on their MOTOBLUR portal. Exactly like...

  • How to resume a broken ADC download

    (I'm documenting this trick for myself to remember, but it can be useful for others…) Apple, on its Apple Developer Connection site, has a bad...

  • WTF is this ‘myEventWatcherDiv’ doing in my web?

    All of a sudden I started to find the following line in most of the web pages I was browsing, including ones I made where...

  • Your privacy on Nokia Ovi Store

    My friend Adam Greenfield recently complained about the over-engineering culture at Nokia: I was given an NFC phone, and told to tap it against the...